Join us on PALTalk!

We are the only Conservative room on PALtalk!

Participate in the "Conservative Discussion and Debate Rock Show"

http://chat.paltalk.com/g2/paltalk/1011133098

Join us on PalTalk! Why? Because We didn't vote for the LIBtard!

Results - PalTalk Court martial #17 - Non Falsies vs. Logicalinsanity Et al CCU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMCiYKShIko (Leave commentary!)

GUILTY!

The Drama never ends...

This is the best the owner of CCU can put down to words...

So... Now you get to see the REAL LogicalInsanity in his own words; a bully.

(12:56 PM) Logicalinsanity: Hey, you pathetic fucks. I watched your little Youtube bullshit. It is exactly what I would have expected from a pathetic drugged out loser like you. For your information, I took the name Logicalinsanity when I signed onto Paltalk in June of 2009 and opened my room a month later
(12:56 PM) Logicalinsanity: I have one alias, johnwaynerocks for my laptop. That is all the nics I have stupid fuck and everybody knows it. My room and I have kept the same name since the start.
(12:56 PM) Logicalinsanity: an intelligent man that had issue with an admin in my room would have come to me to discuss it.
(12:57 PM) Logicalinsanity: not started this bullshit room war crap. You and Greatone are banned.
(12:58 PM) Logicalinsanity: forever, and ever. I will send my spies around and every person we see in your room, or a room you are in, we will ban. Being in the same room with you, or great will be all the reason I need to ban a person.
(12:58 PM) Logicalinsanity: I will make you a parryha that people run like hell from.
(1:01 PM) Logicalinsanity: just being in the same chgat room with you or greatone will get a person banned from my room for life. just that simple shit stain.
(1:02 PM) Logicalinsanity: I never did a fucking thing to you. You have insulted me, called me a liar.
(1:03 PM) Logicalinsanity: so, run along you brain dead piece of dog shit.
(1:03 PM) Logicalinsanity: enjoy those room with you and your trolls.

"It's our capital..."

‘Jerusalem is not a settlement... it’s our capital,’ says Netanyahu
23.03.10


Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu refused to back down today over the building of new settlements in Jerusalem.

“Jerusalem is not a settlement. It's our capital,” Mr Netanyahu said on a visit to Washington. To a prolonged standing ovation, he said Jews had been building in Jerusalem for 3,000 years and would continue to do so.

Speaking to a crowd of 8,000 pro-Israeli activists, the America Israel public affairs committee which included hundreds of congressmen and senators, he insisted that the settlements Israel has built in east Jerusalem are an “inextricable” part of the city and will remain part of Israel under any peace agreement.

“Therefore, building in them in no way precludes the possibility of a two-state solution,” he said. Israel does not want to rule the Palestinians, he said, while calling on Palestinian leaders to begin talks.

But US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said building Jewish homes on land claimed by Palestinians threatens the Obama administration's first attempts at shuttle diplomacy intended to establish an independent Palestinian state.

“Our credibility in this process depends in part on our willingness to praise both sides when they are courageous, and when we don't agree, to say so, and say so unequivocally,” Mrs Clinton said. She also criticised Palestinians who incite violence.

“New construction in east Jerusalem or the West Bank undermines mutual trust and endangers the proximity talks that are the first step toward the full negotiations that both sides want and need,” Mrs Clinton said.

“It exposes daylight between Israel and the United States that others in the region hope to exploit.”

She reassured Israel that America's commitment to its security and future is “rock solid”. She had “friendly” talks with Mr Netanyahu and said both countries were interested in putting the dispute behind them and quickly starting peace talks.

Barack Obama will have private talks with Mr Netanyahu at the White House today, their first meeting since the diplomatic row erupted this month.

Israeli officials say there will be no formal halt to the building but construction may be restricted: Mr Netanyahu has already ordered a partial 10-month freeze on new building in the West Bank.

Preliminary announcement - Paltalk Court Martial # 17

This is a done deal - Tomorrow! Come to the "PT Court Martial Court House" Non Falsies vs. Logicalinsanity Et al CCU 9:30 PM sat Sept 4 2010 Assignedmod Presiding

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kigjLwYSoc

Iran's New Weapons: Signs of Power or Insecurity?

Iran's New Weapons: Signs of Power or Insecurity?
Updated: 14 minutes ago
Print Text Size
Sarah A. Topol

Sarah A. Topol Contributor
AOL News
CAIRO, Egypt (Sept. 4) -- Iran's recent announcements of a raft of new weapons, including a 13-foot-long unmanned bomber aircraft that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called "the ambassador of death," contribute little to its defense and in fact may weaken it, according to U.S. officials and analysts.

A spate of new weapons systems were presented around Iran's National Defense Day on Aug. 22. A day after Ahmadinejad presented the unmanned bomber -- dubbed the Karrar (Farsi for "striker") -- officials presented two new models of high-speed naval vessels. And a week earlier, the Iranian military invited state-run television to film the firing of a new liquid-fueled surface-to-surface missile, called the Qiam.

The new weapons come as international sanctions aimed at getting Iran to prove it's not trying to build nuclear arms begin to bite.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks during a ceremony inaugurating the Karrar drone aircraft.
Iranian Defense Ministry / AP
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks during a ceremony inaugurating the Karrar drone aircraft on Aug. 22. He called the country's first domestically built, long-range, unmanned bomber aircraft an "ambassador of death" to Iran's enemies.

"By isolating itself and showing defiance, Iran increases the strength of the coalition against it," says Daniel Byman, professor at Georgetown University's Security Studies program in Washington. "The new announcements are part of a fairly consistent Iranian policy of saber rattling whenever it feels that its back is against the wall."

But Byman says the bluster is counterproductive. "By preaching defiance and showing how strong it is, Iran scares its neighbors into wanting to work with Washington more," he says.

Iran's new military capabilities are impossible to verify independently, but analysts say their significance is less related to war fighting than to placating the regime's domestic support base -- and sending not so subtle warnings to bordering countries against cooperating with the U.S.

"It is a mistake on our part to assume [these weapons] are really intended to sort of scare off the U.S. and the West in general," says Alex Vatanka, editor of the Jane's Islamic Affairs Analyst newsletter in Washington. "They're far more intended to change minds in the Arab states to the south of Iran" that are members of the Gulf Cooperation Council.

"What they're doing with these defense shows is to say in so many words that any country that is party to or is complicit in an attack on Iran will be hit," Vatanka says. "For Iranians, it's more like a Catch-22: If you don't do anything, then they say you're weak, you can't stand up for yourself. And if you do, then you're scaring the neighbors."

But Iran's choice of displaying military might may end up backfiring. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters in Washington last week the new weapons could reduce Iran's security as America increases ties with regional allies to counter Iran's threat. "This is one of the reasons why we believe that if Iran continues on the path that it's on, it actually might find itself less secure," he said.

For the past several years, the U.S. has been increasing regional military cooperation in the Middle East with the intention of countering Iran's growing threat. The U.S. maintains a military presence in Kuwait, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. The U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet is based in Bahrain, while military trainers work in Saudi Arabia.

"Iran has a right to provide for its self-defense, but the U.S. remains concerned about systems that could threaten stability in the region," a U.S. Defense Department spokesman told AOL News.

Indeed, military ties between Iran's neighbors and the U.S. appear to be strengthening. Saudi Arabia is set to make a major U.S. arms purchase this month, including Black Hawk and Apache helicopters, as well as F-15 planes estimated to cost between $30 billion and $60 billion. Officials interviewed by The Wall Street Journal said this would be the largest arms deal in history.

In addition, the United Arab Emirates may buy a $7 billion missile defense system next year. The Theater High Altitude Area Defense system would protect the UAE from short-, medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, such as those Iran possesses. According to Reuters, the deal would be the first international sale of the high-tech system.

Some are skeptical that Iran's new arms will have any real role in fomenting closer ties to the U.S. in the region. "Irrespective of Iran, you would find a strong cooperation between the United States and Egypt, the United States and Saudi Arabia and most of the major Arab states," says Suzanne Maloney, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution's Saber Center for Middle East Policy and a former State Department adviser. "I don't know that the acquisition of any particular technology really alters or intensifies the relationship between Washington and its allies in the region all that significantly."

Sponsored Links
Indeed, it's not clear that Iran's new weapons are all they're cracked up to be. When Ahmadinejad unveiled the drone on a stage in honor of Iran's National Defense Day, he said it could carry four cruise missiles for a distance of 620 miles. But Peter Singer, director of the 21st Century Defense Initiative and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, says the aircraft does not look capable of holding that much missile weight. The range of the weapon and how it would perform in a combat setting is also unclear.

"Displaying on a stage is a lot different than displaying its capabilities," says Singer, adding that he attaches more importance to what the weapons announcements say about Tehran.

"The approach of the regime that celebrates the development of a new weapon as if it's the launch of the iPad and uses propaganda to describe it as the 'ambassador of death' is sort of begging the question: Really, this is the way you're handling yourself in the 21st century?" he says. "That's my question."