Come on now!

You let your own brother continue to live in a hut?

If so... What are you going to do for the brotha's of Philli and Watts?

Is this the best you can do?

Sitcom FAME is there in the making!

Looks like a television hit!

Lt Col. Terry Lakin Awareness Day

Our support and prayers go out to Lt. Colonel Terry Lakin for having the spine to stand up to the Unqualified One.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o48ZRC0Lhq8

Join us on PALTalk!

We are the only Conservative room on PALtalk!

Participate in the "Conservative Discussion and Debate Rock Show"

http://chat.paltalk.com/g2/paltalk/1011133098

Join us on PalTalk! Why? Because We didn't vote for the LIBtard!

Results - PalTalk Court martial #17 - Non Falsies vs. Logicalinsanity Et al CCU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMCiYKShIko (Leave commentary!)

GUILTY!

The Drama never ends...

This is the best the owner of CCU can put down to words...

So... Now you get to see the REAL LogicalInsanity in his own words; a bully.

(12:56 PM) Logicalinsanity: Hey, you pathetic fucks. I watched your little Youtube bullshit. It is exactly what I would have expected from a pathetic drugged out loser like you. For your information, I took the name Logicalinsanity when I signed onto Paltalk in June of 2009 and opened my room a month later
(12:56 PM) Logicalinsanity: I have one alias, johnwaynerocks for my laptop. That is all the nics I have stupid fuck and everybody knows it. My room and I have kept the same name since the start.
(12:56 PM) Logicalinsanity: an intelligent man that had issue with an admin in my room would have come to me to discuss it.
(12:57 PM) Logicalinsanity: not started this bullshit room war crap. You and Greatone are banned.
(12:58 PM) Logicalinsanity: forever, and ever. I will send my spies around and every person we see in your room, or a room you are in, we will ban. Being in the same room with you, or great will be all the reason I need to ban a person.
(12:58 PM) Logicalinsanity: I will make you a parryha that people run like hell from.
(1:01 PM) Logicalinsanity: just being in the same chgat room with you or greatone will get a person banned from my room for life. just that simple shit stain.
(1:02 PM) Logicalinsanity: I never did a fucking thing to you. You have insulted me, called me a liar.
(1:03 PM) Logicalinsanity: so, run along you brain dead piece of dog shit.
(1:03 PM) Logicalinsanity: enjoy those room with you and your trolls.

"It's our capital..."

‘Jerusalem is not a settlement... it’s our capital,’ says Netanyahu
23.03.10


Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu refused to back down today over the building of new settlements in Jerusalem.

“Jerusalem is not a settlement. It's our capital,” Mr Netanyahu said on a visit to Washington. To a prolonged standing ovation, he said Jews had been building in Jerusalem for 3,000 years and would continue to do so.

Speaking to a crowd of 8,000 pro-Israeli activists, the America Israel public affairs committee which included hundreds of congressmen and senators, he insisted that the settlements Israel has built in east Jerusalem are an “inextricable” part of the city and will remain part of Israel under any peace agreement.

“Therefore, building in them in no way precludes the possibility of a two-state solution,” he said. Israel does not want to rule the Palestinians, he said, while calling on Palestinian leaders to begin talks.

But US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said building Jewish homes on land claimed by Palestinians threatens the Obama administration's first attempts at shuttle diplomacy intended to establish an independent Palestinian state.

“Our credibility in this process depends in part on our willingness to praise both sides when they are courageous, and when we don't agree, to say so, and say so unequivocally,” Mrs Clinton said. She also criticised Palestinians who incite violence.

“New construction in east Jerusalem or the West Bank undermines mutual trust and endangers the proximity talks that are the first step toward the full negotiations that both sides want and need,” Mrs Clinton said.

“It exposes daylight between Israel and the United States that others in the region hope to exploit.”

She reassured Israel that America's commitment to its security and future is “rock solid”. She had “friendly” talks with Mr Netanyahu and said both countries were interested in putting the dispute behind them and quickly starting peace talks.

Barack Obama will have private talks with Mr Netanyahu at the White House today, their first meeting since the diplomatic row erupted this month.

Israeli officials say there will be no formal halt to the building but construction may be restricted: Mr Netanyahu has already ordered a partial 10-month freeze on new building in the West Bank.

Preliminary announcement - Paltalk Court Martial # 17

This is a done deal - Tomorrow! Come to the "PT Court Martial Court House" Non Falsies vs. Logicalinsanity Et al CCU 9:30 PM sat Sept 4 2010 Assignedmod Presiding

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kigjLwYSoc

Iran's New Weapons: Signs of Power or Insecurity?

Iran's New Weapons: Signs of Power or Insecurity?
Updated: 14 minutes ago
Print Text Size
Sarah A. Topol

Sarah A. Topol Contributor
AOL News
CAIRO, Egypt (Sept. 4) -- Iran's recent announcements of a raft of new weapons, including a 13-foot-long unmanned bomber aircraft that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called "the ambassador of death," contribute little to its defense and in fact may weaken it, according to U.S. officials and analysts.

A spate of new weapons systems were presented around Iran's National Defense Day on Aug. 22. A day after Ahmadinejad presented the unmanned bomber -- dubbed the Karrar (Farsi for "striker") -- officials presented two new models of high-speed naval vessels. And a week earlier, the Iranian military invited state-run television to film the firing of a new liquid-fueled surface-to-surface missile, called the Qiam.

The new weapons come as international sanctions aimed at getting Iran to prove it's not trying to build nuclear arms begin to bite.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks during a ceremony inaugurating the Karrar drone aircraft.
Iranian Defense Ministry / AP
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks during a ceremony inaugurating the Karrar drone aircraft on Aug. 22. He called the country's first domestically built, long-range, unmanned bomber aircraft an "ambassador of death" to Iran's enemies.

"By isolating itself and showing defiance, Iran increases the strength of the coalition against it," says Daniel Byman, professor at Georgetown University's Security Studies program in Washington. "The new announcements are part of a fairly consistent Iranian policy of saber rattling whenever it feels that its back is against the wall."

But Byman says the bluster is counterproductive. "By preaching defiance and showing how strong it is, Iran scares its neighbors into wanting to work with Washington more," he says.

Iran's new military capabilities are impossible to verify independently, but analysts say their significance is less related to war fighting than to placating the regime's domestic support base -- and sending not so subtle warnings to bordering countries against cooperating with the U.S.

"It is a mistake on our part to assume [these weapons] are really intended to sort of scare off the U.S. and the West in general," says Alex Vatanka, editor of the Jane's Islamic Affairs Analyst newsletter in Washington. "They're far more intended to change minds in the Arab states to the south of Iran" that are members of the Gulf Cooperation Council.

"What they're doing with these defense shows is to say in so many words that any country that is party to or is complicit in an attack on Iran will be hit," Vatanka says. "For Iranians, it's more like a Catch-22: If you don't do anything, then they say you're weak, you can't stand up for yourself. And if you do, then you're scaring the neighbors."

But Iran's choice of displaying military might may end up backfiring. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters in Washington last week the new weapons could reduce Iran's security as America increases ties with regional allies to counter Iran's threat. "This is one of the reasons why we believe that if Iran continues on the path that it's on, it actually might find itself less secure," he said.

For the past several years, the U.S. has been increasing regional military cooperation in the Middle East with the intention of countering Iran's growing threat. The U.S. maintains a military presence in Kuwait, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. The U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet is based in Bahrain, while military trainers work in Saudi Arabia.

"Iran has a right to provide for its self-defense, but the U.S. remains concerned about systems that could threaten stability in the region," a U.S. Defense Department spokesman told AOL News.

Indeed, military ties between Iran's neighbors and the U.S. appear to be strengthening. Saudi Arabia is set to make a major U.S. arms purchase this month, including Black Hawk and Apache helicopters, as well as F-15 planes estimated to cost between $30 billion and $60 billion. Officials interviewed by The Wall Street Journal said this would be the largest arms deal in history.

In addition, the United Arab Emirates may buy a $7 billion missile defense system next year. The Theater High Altitude Area Defense system would protect the UAE from short-, medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, such as those Iran possesses. According to Reuters, the deal would be the first international sale of the high-tech system.

Some are skeptical that Iran's new arms will have any real role in fomenting closer ties to the U.S. in the region. "Irrespective of Iran, you would find a strong cooperation between the United States and Egypt, the United States and Saudi Arabia and most of the major Arab states," says Suzanne Maloney, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution's Saber Center for Middle East Policy and a former State Department adviser. "I don't know that the acquisition of any particular technology really alters or intensifies the relationship between Washington and its allies in the region all that significantly."

Sponsored Links
Indeed, it's not clear that Iran's new weapons are all they're cracked up to be. When Ahmadinejad unveiled the drone on a stage in honor of Iran's National Defense Day, he said it could carry four cruise missiles for a distance of 620 miles. But Peter Singer, director of the 21st Century Defense Initiative and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, says the aircraft does not look capable of holding that much missile weight. The range of the weapon and how it would perform in a combat setting is also unclear.

"Displaying on a stage is a lot different than displaying its capabilities," says Singer, adding that he attaches more importance to what the weapons announcements say about Tehran.

"The approach of the regime that celebrates the development of a new weapon as if it's the launch of the iPad and uses propaganda to describe it as the 'ambassador of death' is sort of begging the question: Really, this is the way you're handling yourself in the 21st century?" he says. "That's my question."

Happy 4th - 2010 we have Marxists in our White House

The REAL Chris Matthews

The US government is now a "Regime!"

Liberal Media continuing to push the "They are racist's! position

Matthews: Limbaugh's Fans Only Listening Because They're Mad At Their Obama Loving Kids By: Geoffrey Dickens April 05, 2010 19:41 ET



Chris Matthews, on Monday's Hardball, took after Rush Limbaugh for his use of the words "regime" and "junta" in talking about Barack Obama's presidency. After playing a clip of the talk radio host making fun of Matthews, for making fun of Limbaugh's use of the word regime, the Hardball host and his panelists charged Limbaugh and his listeners of trying to de-legitimize the President and accused them of racism. MSNBC political analyst Richard Wolffe even went as far to insist the opposition to the President is all about "his color." Matthews also went on to hysterically claim Limbaugh's listeners are only tuning in because they're "mad at their kids" for supporting Obama.

MATTHEWS: But could it be that these people who are listening to him on the radio are just mad at the kids? Because their kids disagree with them! The kids don't think this guy is illegitimate. The kids want the health care bill! The kids voted for him!

(After clip of Barack Obama talking about Rush Limbaugh with CBS's Harry Smith)

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Talk about product placement. Rush Limbaugh responded this weekend with what we call the "Dick Cheney method." In other words he put out an e-mail this time to Politico. Quote: "I think the President is trying to distract me, to get me talking about me, on my show instead of talking about him and the regime's agenda. But it won't work. I'm wise to their tactics. I know that a majority of Americans are angry at the regime and the Democrats' constant attempts at character assassination of their opposition. They want no part of engaging us in the arena of ideas. They seek instead to discredit and marginalize us, it's gotten old." end quote. So who stands to gain or lose by this running chat? Eugene Robinson is a Washington Post columnist, a Pulitzer prize winner of course and MSNBC political analyst as well. And Richard Wolffe is an MSNBC analyst and author of Renegade. Gentlemen, you first Gene, it seems to me that the President, let's start, with who started this. Naming the names of somebody in the media, no matter how prominent they are, is unusual for a president. There he did it.

EUGENE ROBINSON, WASHINGTON POST: It is. Yes he did it and I think he's made the calculation that, that these are pretty good opponents to have. It sharpens the contradictions as it were and, and I think, you know, he'd be happy to be running against Rush Limbaugh and running against Glenn Beck and running against Sarah Palin for that more that matter.

MATTHEWS: Well the dittoheads, and they're self-described, it's a term they use to show their allegiance to - it's an unusual term for independent-minded Americans.

RICHARD WOLFFE: Are you suggesting it's a regime?

MATTHEWS: Well I don't know, but they do love this guy. He's a fantastic entertainer. He is a man of the right and he says things most, a lot of people don't disagree with, but a lot of people do. So here he is talking about regime, he's talking about junta today.

WOLFFE: Where do you think he's going with this?

MATTHEWS: Well what do you think? I have my comment coming at the end of the show.

WOLFFE: Well it's been great for his ratings, that's true. The White House, I was talking to some White House officials about this, they see this as a sort of matter of self defense. The President's got to stand up for himself. Obviously, here he was asked a question so it was prompted. They're not going out of their way to make it as a campaign as maybe some like Rahm Emanuel will try to make it a little bit of an issue before. But it's about self-defense. He's got to stand up for himself because the stuff they're saying, in the White House's view and frankly in any reasonable person's view is extreme.

MATTHEWS: It seems to me that there's a cake they're baking on the right and very effectively. And all the ingredients are socialist, the de-legitimizing of people, the Birthers who say he's not really an American. The attempt to talk, takeovers, all these terms seem foreign and use-

ROBINSON: "I want my country back."

MATTHEWS: "My country back." You know it seems like they're baking a cake so the people get this idea. "He's not one of us."

ROBINSON: "He's not one of us and he's not legitimate. And you know the use of the word regime for example.

MATTHEWS: Junta today!

ROBINSON: Junta.

MATTHEWS: That's the military guys, the cabal. Oh he used it today. Well here he is because I think maybe I had a small part in this, I humbly admit. A small part. Here he is the President [sic] reacting today to something moi said on Friday night. I am so small in this debate. Here he is with a word, he's upping the grade here. Here he is. Let's listen to Rush Limbaugh.

(Begin clip)

RUSH LIMBAUGH: Chris, if you don't like regime, I'll call him a junta. You know, whatever? They're governing against the will of the people. It simply doesn't matter. Back room deals. Bribes. Unconstitutionality in order to get legislation passed. Legislation the vast majority of American people don't want. It's a regime.

(End clip)

MATTHEWS: Regime is a word that means foreign. The word we got used to in this country, by the way, from the Bush team. I once called it "a Bush regime" and I'll pay for that as long as I live. But the fact is the idea of foreign regime change, if there was a phrase that got into our head before that last word, there's something to be taken down. Saddam Hussein is a regime. It's a use of a word with this whole confection they're putting together. "The guy's a foreigner!"

WOLFFE: Right.

ROBINSON: Yeah.

MATTHEWS: "He's the enemy of the country."

WOLFFE: Well I think they mean in the French sense, right? "He's a foreigner, he's a dictator, he's a tyrant."

MATTHEWS: "He's a junta leader!"

WOLFFE: And there's an ideological element to it. But Chris I don't want you to get distracted here. Because you know, you gotta, you, don't let his character assassination come after you. You have to stick with it! It is, it is, it is, it's more than a confection. It's an organized system that they're trying to place on this White House to say that they're undemocratic and, yes, there is a foreign element to it which you've gotta, you've gotta be honest about, has got something to do with the President's color. There's no two ways about it. It's his color, it's his name, the foreign nature of it and the ideological piece of it. He didn't even sign up to a public option. Excuse me? What kind of junta would do that?

MATTHEWS: You know I liked, I know. Look I'm gonna talk about it later so I don't give away my commentary which I'm already telegraphing guys. And I think you know where I'm going with this.

ROBINSON: Yes.

MATTHEWS: But I think, I think there's wonderful things about America, that institutionalize the fact that we accept he's not just a political leader or even head of an administration or chief executive or commander in chief but he is head of the country. He is representative of our republic. Our president is special. When he comes through a room, you hold your kids up to see the President. When the baseball season starts, the old American sport of baseball, the President's there to throw it out, to throw out the first pitch. It's an institutionalizing of something better than politics. It's our unity. And when you start calling him a regime or – look here he is at the game today – you start referring to him as a junta or regime, you're basically saying he's even in the office officially. He's somehow an interloper, a junta leader, a military coup leader.

ROBINSON: Right. The President is the head of state.

MATTHEWS: But they don't accept that!

ROBINSON: They're different from being just the head of government.

MATTHEWS: Right.

ROBINSON: You know? There's, we don't make that separation.

MATTHEWS: He's our temporary monarch. We elect him or dump him out of office, but while he's there, he represents our country.

ROBINSON: We play Hail to the Chief when he comes into the room, you know? And, and this is an attempt to deny that. To say that's not true about this president.

MATTHEWS: Because?

ROBINSON: Does it have something to do with his color, by the way? I think so. I think so.

MATTHEWS: Well let me ask you. What other reason? Well, I don't, I never get, I don't know. I was about to say something that's not true. I never get into motive. I do get into motive. But here's the question. What reason do they have for saying - here's the bill of particulars. "Backroom deals." Is that new in American politics?

WOLFFE: I believe that's part of Congress.

MATTHEWS: "Bribes?" It's a crime. It ain't new and I don't think he's guilty of that. "Unconstitutionality in order to get the legislation passed." He went through the regular order. They passed the health care bill with 60 senators. They had 60 senators for a while there with Ted Kennedy.

WOLFFE: If I'm not mistaken the filibuster isn't in the Constitution anyway. So-

MATTHEWS: Well but they did get the 60 votes they needed. They used reconciliation to tweak it a little bit. Nobody's challenged them on the way they did it! They didn't do this "deemed to have passed" number they were talking of doing. They did do it legally.

ROBINSON: They passed the legislation the way it says in the Constitution. You pass the legislation.

MATTHEWS: So what has he done that's made him foreigner? Back room deals? I think they go back, way back. I think the, we cut a deal about putting the capital in Washington. That was a deal.

WOLFFE: I've done interviews conservative talk radio hosts where they're convinced that the birth certificate fabricated. You know this is, this is mainstream!

MATTHEWS: Because they think he's born in Kenya or Indonesia?

WOLFFE: Exactly.

MATTHEWS: Or where?

WOLFFE: No Kenya, wherever. Kenya.

ROBINSON: Kenya mostly but-

WOLFFE: "The serial numbers are blacked out." You know it doesn't matter what it is. They cannot accept the result of the election. That it wasn't even close, okay? This is a guy who won Indiana, North Carolina, Virginia, he's a Democrat. And, and this whole idea of de-legitimizing him. I think it speaks to their own problems of dealing with the election.

MATTHEWS: Well let me just tell you. I may be, not the oldest guy here, I think you and I are about the same. I think we're older than you. But if you talk about your kids today, they don't know what we're talking about. They don't understand this way Limbaugh is talking.

WOLFFE: No, I don't think so.

ROBINSON: No-

MATTHEWS: They think, they think he's one of us. There's no question about it. And this talk about "If you're out, you're black, if you're white you're in." That's old talk. That's your grandparents talking.

WOLFFE: Well it's that and it's, and it's his name and it's his father and it's all mixed up in some jumble of rumor. I mean this, this started in the campaign.

MATTHEWS: Do you think the Limbaugh audience, not to knock anybody that listens to the radio because he is a great entertainer and he's, he's a smart guy about what he is doing, which is what he's doing. But could it be that these people who are listening to him on the radio are just mad at the kids? Because their kids disagree with them! The kids don't think this guy is illegitimate. The kids want the health care bill! The kids voted for him!

ROBINSON: I think some of them, I think some of them are mad at a lot of things. At maybe the kids too.

MATTHEWS: Their, their boss? Their wives. I have a whole theory. I believe that Rush Limbaugh is basically a support group for traveling sales men. The boss keeps giving them a higher quota. He's screwing them. The wife doesn't appreciate what he does, how hard he works. The only person who roots for them every day is Rush Limbaugh. Every day he says "You're great! Those damn feminazis are out there. You're great!" Rush, you're a genius. You are brilliant as a support group. You ought to be a social worker. Anyway, Richard Wolffe thank you. Eugene Robinson.


—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.

The LEFT can't help themselves

If we do believe it... Let's see him change our minds!

NEW YORK – On the heels of health care, a new Harris poll reveals Republican attitudes about Obama: Two-thirds think he's a socialist, 57 percent a Muslim—and 24 percent say "he may be the Antichrist."

To anyone who thinks the end of the health-care vote means a return to civility, wake up.

Obama Derangement Syndrome—pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism—has infected the Republican Party. Here's new data to prove it:

67 percent of Republicans (and 40 percent of Americans overall) believe that Obama is a socialist. http://www.oldbeacon.com/beacon/airlines/images/flag-soviet_union.jpg

The belief that Obama is a “domestic enemy” is widely held—a sign of trouble yet to come.

57 percent of Republicans (32 percent overall) believe that Obama is a Muslim 45 percent of Republicans (25 percent overall) agree with the Birthers in their belief that Obama was "not born in the United States and so is not eligible to be president" 38 percent of Republicans (20 percent overall) say that Obama is "doing many of the things that Hitler did" Scariest of all, 24 percent of Republicans (14 percent overall) say that Obama "may be the Antichrist." These numbers all come from a brand-new Louis Harris poll, inspired in part by my new book Wingnuts. It demonstrates the cost of the campaign of fear and hate that has been pumped up in the service of hyper-partisanship over the past 15 months. We are playing with dynamite by demonizing our president and dividing the United States in the process. What might be good for ratings is bad for the country.

The poll, which surveyed 2,230 people right at the height of the health-care reform debate, also clearly shows that education is a barrier to extremism. Respondents without a college education are vastly more likely to believe such claims, while Americans with college degrees or better are less easily duped. It's a reminder of what the 19th-century educator Horace Mann once too-loftily said: "Ignorance breeds monsters to fill up the vacancies of the soul that are unoccupied by the verities of knowledge."

The full results of the poll, which will be released in greater detail tomorrow, are even more frightening: including news that high percentages of Republicans—and Americans overall—believe that President Obama is "racist," "anti-American" "wants the terrorists to win" and "wants to turn over the sovereignty of the United States to a one-world government." The "Hatriot" belief that Obama is a "domestic enemy" as set forth in the Constitution is also widely held—a sign of trouble yet to come. It's the same claim made by Marine Lance Corporal Kody Brittingham in his letter of intent to assassinate the President Obama.

This poll is the latest and most detailed evidence of the extent to which Wingnuts are hijacking our politics. It should be a wakeup call to all Americans and a collective reminder, as we move past health-care reform, that we need to stand up to extremism.

John Avlon's new book Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe is Hijacking America is available now by Beast Books both on the Web and in paperback. He is also the author of Independent Nation: How Centrists Can Change American Politics. Previously, he served as chief speechwriter for New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and was a columnist and associate editor for The New York Sun.


For More of The Daily Beast, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.


For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.

Rules for Radicals

We are now the Soviet Union

We became what we never thought we would become; a copy of the Soviet Union.

- We promote the benefit of the individual at the expense of open theft of others.

- We spy on our population.

- We promote wars without purpose and for slighted cause.

- We demand others pay for products they do not wish to purchase.

The only thing missing in this devine Chosen One's equation is the goose stepping brown shirts pushing machine guns in our faces as we move from what could be seen as a police State to one of total governmental control.


The LEFT fails to acknowledge that rendition and indefinite detention still exist, as they continue to keep Gitmo open, and as President Obama continues to play "judge, jury, and executioner" with his DRONE game over territory not belonging to the United States of America.

Today we woke up to "ameri-K-a" as a replacement to what we once had as a nation. Since this is what has unfolded before us... we are now left with no choice; public protest, and increased stoppage of support. "ameri-K-a" is NOT sustainable so we should endeavor to see it FALL. In a Marxist nation you will be forced to farm and feed an unworking population... so farmers should be encouraged to stop farming. In a Marxist nation they also will tax you to no end... so you must curb your life choices so as to deny them tax money. You should also step into the healthcare assistance lines and demand they care for you; migrains, back pain, and joint pain are recognized conditions that affect one's ability to participate in the work force. We need to bankrupt them.

We can revolt like the Iranians.

We can openly protest like the French do in France.

Glenn Beck admits "It does not matter" - Birther issue

America Rising